I am back… Jupiter Impact 32 days after its discovery
So after the Jupiter Impact and the madness which followed, I got buried into a lot of work. Today, I will not post much but a brief summary of my past two weeks.
I spent a significant amount of time getting telescope time and preparing the observations for the VLT/NACO and WHT/NAOMI. Both telescopes are available in service observing, meaning that I don’t have to conduct myself the observations. However one needs to plan accurately as possible the way the observations should be conducted. The observing modes, pixel scale, filters, sky positions should be defined advance. ESO has developed a software called P2PP (a.k.a the nightmare of all observers) which helps in planning the observations. Each defined set of observations (called OBs for Observing Block) are then run by the astronomer in duty. In the perfect world, the OBs will be perfect and the astronomers will not have to do anything.
The reality is quite different. To summarize, I did screw up my NACO OBs but I found out 4 hours before the observations (on Saturday afternoon), and sent them a correction… that they never received because the network was down at Mount Paranal. Our run was saved by the astronomer in duty (Emanuela Pompei, Thanks!) and we got some observations of Jupiter impact with NACO on July 26 (6 days after the discovery of the impact). I am attaching below two RAW images showing the impact feature at 2.48 um. The image on the right has most likely a better angular resolution, and the “duck-feet” feature is still visible. At low resolution (on the left), two maxima only are visible.
My colleague R. Hueso, from the University of Basque Country, interrupted his vacation to de-project the left image (see on the left) and compare it with the Keck observations. The two maxima are now barely visible, they are separated by 8 degrees (instead of 3 deg) and the ejecta field is more extended. The continued longitudinal shearing is consistent with several amateur observations of the site (see below) and with the behavior of the impact sites associated with the impacts of SL/9 in 1994.