The OurPluto naming campaign has been an exhilarating experience for me so far. The amount of thought that our site visitors have been putting into their nominations astounds me. You can visit the Site News page for regular updates. Today I would just like to highlight a few of the new names that we added to the ballot last night.
On the list of scientists and engineers, we have added Carl Pulfrich, 1858-1927. Although he died before the 1930 discovery of Pluto, he contributed in a critical way—he invented the blink comparator. This is a device that lets you switch back and forth between two sky plates, looking for subtle changes. Clyde Tombaugh discovered Pluto using a blink comparator. The discovery would not have been possible without the device.
From Europe, we were reminded of the importance of the Soviet The Luna Program: “Luna was a series of robotic spacecraft missions sent to the Moon by the Soviet Union between 1959 and 1976. Fifteen were successful, each designed as either an orbiter or lander, and accomplished many firsts in space exploration. They also performed many experiments, studying the Moon’s chemical composition, gravity, temperature, and radiation. Twenty-four spacecraft were formally given the Luna designation, although more were launched.”
Two prominent women explorers were also nominated. For Alexandrine Tinné, who explored the Nile and the Sahara in the 1860s, the nomination reads, “It is rare that we take the opportunity to praise some of the women who have contributed to the exploration of our world. Ms. Tinné was courageous, dedicated, and passed on a legacy of adventure for today’s women to aspire to.”
We also learned about Jeanne Baré who, a century earlier, became the first woman to circumnavigate the globe. She was naturalist studying the world’s plants. However, times being what they were, she had to impersonate a man for the journey.
Our fictional explorers now include several popular nominees. Among others, we include a pair of the great travelers in literature, Don Quijote and his patient squire Sancho Panza.
In the category of Underworld beings, we learned that the King of the Underworld in Vietnam has a Pluto connection. “Diem Vuong is the King of Hades. Demons obey and serve him. He is the ruler of the underworld and the judge of the bad souls after death. Diem Vuong once upon a time has been added to form “Diem Vuong Tinh” to name for Pluto in Vietnamese.”
In Inuit mythology, we learned that the realm of the dead has an astronomical connection. The souls of the dead first spend time under ground in Adlivun, but later ascend to a permanent home in Quidlivun, on the Moon.
Pluto is just 3.5 pixels across in the latest images from the New Horizons spacecraft. That’s nine square pixels. You can’t do much with nine pixels. You might be able to see crude patterns of light and dark, but you probably wouldn’t call it a map. Still, it’s a start.
In a few months, this will all change. Craters, mountains and other landforms will take shape before our eyes. When New Horizons flies past Pluto in July, we will see a new, alien landscape in stark detail. At that point, we will have a lot to talk about. The only way we can talk about it is if those features, whatever they turn out to be, have names.
Today we are beginning a campaign called “Our Pluto”. The goal is to gather together the names that we will eventually use to label the maps of Pluto and its large moon, Charon. After discussions with the International Astronomical Union (IAU), we have defined a set of broad themes for these names, related to mythology, literature and history.
The New Horizons science team is doing something unprecedented. Naming campaigns have been held before, but on a different scale. Today, the entire landscapes of Pluto and Charon is open to the public. We have called the campaign “Our Pluto” because we think that everyone should have a say in the names we use on those strange and distant worlds. At ourpluto.seti.org, you can vote for your favorite names, talk about them, and nominate names that we might have overlooked.
After the campaign ends, the New Horizons science team will select your best ideas and pitch them to the IAU. The IAU will have final say over the names on the maps of Pluto and Charon.
Let the conversation begin!
The name Eadweard James Muybridge does not roll off the tongue, but we have all seen his images. In the earliest days of photography, he pioneered the use of the newly-invented camera to study animals and people in motion. In his classic studies of horses, for example, he demonstrated for the first time that there exists a moment in the cadence of a trotting horse when it is airborn–all four feet are off the ground. The technical setup required to obtain one of these sequences was substantial. Each image was taken by a different camera, which was triggered by a separate thread as the horse passed by.
Needless to say, the cameras of the 19th century lacked “burst mode”, or even auto-advance, or even film. These are the features that have made it trivial for 20th- and 21st-century photographers to capture a similar sequence of images. Today, I can just set my iPhone on video mode and let it do all the work.
However, one truth about action photography has never changed–you need to follow the motion. Otherwise, you will get nothing but a blur. Save your tripod for subjects that are willing to sit still. Had Muybridge attempted the same photo sequence without all those separate triggers, his image would have looked something more like this. All background, no horse!
So it is, strangely enough, when trying to take pictures of distant moons. Like fidgety children, moons are unwilling to sit still for the camera. This is the challenge we dealt with in finding a tiny moon of Neptune whose discovery was announced today. It has a special distinction–it never sits still long enough to have its picture taken. Neptune is a big planet with a strong gravity field, and moons whip around it very fast. This one circles the entire planet, following a path of over 600,000 km, in less than a day.
The moon is also very small and dark. We estimate that it is no more than 20 km across and as dark as if it were paved with dirty asphalt. Naturally, taking its picture requires long exposures. But there’s the rub. If you expose it for too long, the moon vanishes in a blur, much like the disappearing racehorse above.
The images in which we found tiny “S/2004 N 1″ (don’t worry, it will get a better name soon!) were taken by the Hubble Space Telescope between 2004 and 2009. In fact, these images have been freely available to anyone in the world, some for almost a decade. However, what they have in common is that they were all taken by keeping the camera fixed on Neptune. In the past, we have always discovered moons just by stacking up images like this, or perhaps animating them into a movie, and seeing what turns up. This actually works fine for Pluto, a dwarf planet with a weak gravity field. The small moons of Pluto, including the recently-named Kerberos and Styx, take weeks to circle Pluto, so summing up a few hours of data works just fine. Not so at Neptune.
Once the images are on the ground, it is too late to track the motion of a tiny moon. Besides, if we don’t know where a moon is, how could we know how to track it? The solution we found builds on the fact that moons are a bit more predictable than racehorses and fidgety children. We might not know where the moons are, but we do know how they move. As a result, we were able to write software to do all the motion-tracking, by letting a computer shift and add up the images after the fact. The procedure I devised predicts where any given moon ought to move from one image to the next, and then combines the images with a “twist” that compensates for the expected motion. I developed this procedure (and I am certainly not the first) to study some peculiar arcs in the rings of Neptune. However, I soon realized it could be useful for moons as well. It was only when I expanded my analysis out to regions well beyond Neptune’s ring system that an extra little dot turned up, over and over again. In less than a week, we went from our first detection to ten.
The discovery of one little moon might not be Earth-shaking, but somehow it is has to fit into the big picture of how the Neptune system formed. Astronomers had long noted that the moons of Neptune get progressively smaller as you go inward. However, this little rock, orbiting between 200-km Larissa and 400-km Proteus, throws a bit of a wrench into that simple story.
What we do know is that Triton, a very large moon, got captured into orbit around Neptune eons ago. Triton’s distinction is that it orbits backwards, circling the planet opposite to the planet’s rotation and opposite to the direction of the other moons. We can be pretty sure that when Triton arrived, it disrupted whatever system of moons was originally circling Neptune. The moons that we see today somehow re-formed after that event. With the discovery of S/2004 N 1, the key points of this story have not changed, but we now have one more piece of the puzzle to fit into place.
Pluto needs more moons!
In addition to surpassing 220,000 votes in just a bit over three days, we have received about 15,000 nominations for alternative names. Today I have just added eight more to the ballot, selected from among the most popular nominees. (more…)
We have made our first addition to the ballot. Vulcan is the Roman god of lava and smoke, and the nephew of Pluto. (Any connection to the Star Trek TV series is purely coincidental, although we can be sure that Gene Roddenberry read the classics.). Thanks to William Shatner for the suggestion!
So what do you think of the idea of naming the two moons of Pluto Vulcan and Romulus?You have mythology, pos and neg plutorocks.com/ground-rules
— William Shatner (@WilliamShatner) February 12, 2013
The naming of a moon is a rare privilege for any astronomer. Fewer than 200 moons have been discovered orbiting the Solar System’s planets (dwarf or otherwise).
Over the centuries, the astronomical community has established standards for the naming of moons. Most names come from ancient mythologies. The moons of Uranus are the exception, with names coming primarily from the works of William Shakespeare.
These rules ensure that newly-discovered moons receive names that have already stood the test of time. The same names will still be in use centuries and even millennia from now. Whereas today’s literature might be long forgotten, we can be confident that future generations of astronomers (and maybe even astronauts) will still recall the stories from Mount Olympus and Stratford-upon-Avon.
I suspect these naming traditions did not arise by accident. For whatever reason, we humans seem to have a deep-seated, pre-scientific need to interpret the night sky in terms of stories. Naturally, we choose the big stories, involving grand themes, great powers and deep mysteries.
I was previously involved in the naming of three moons: Pan at Saturn, plus Mab and Cupid at Uranus. In each case, the process was simple and straightforward. We pulled out our dusty old copies of Bullfinch’s Mythology or the Riverside Shakespeare and started browsing. (In each case, I also experienced a wistful regret that I had not spent more time studying literature in college, back when I still had the opportunity.)
When we announced the discoveries of Pluto’s fourth and fifth moons, it became clear to me that the naming process might have to be different. This time, I received hundreds of spontaneous, unsolicited suggestions. I suspect that some of the world’s affection for Pluto comes from its so-called “demotion” to dwarf planet status. Perhaps it is also because the names of Pluto’s moons are all associated with Hades and the Underworld, the stuff of so many of our most primal fears. Whatever the reason, the discovery team has decided that it would be unfair to keep the naming process to ourselves.
Starting today, we are trying something new. We are asking the public to help us name the moons. Visit plutorocks.seti.org and tell us what you think. We have seeded the ballot with a few names, or you can propose your own. The names will still have to be approved by the International Astronomical Union, but we will use your votes to help us decide the names we propose.
Please join us in adding the next chapter to the story of Pluto.