Cosmic Diary Logo

Meet the astronomers. See where they work. Know what they know.


The Project:

The Cosmic Diary is not just about astronomy. It's more about what it is like to be an astronomer.

The Cosmic Diary aims to put a human face on astronomy: professional scientists will blog in text and images about their lives, families, friends, hobbies and interests, as well as their work, their latest research findings and the challenges that face them. The bloggers represent a vibrant cross-section of female and male working astronomers from around the world, coming from five different continents. Outside the observatories, labs and offices they are musicians, mothers, photographers, athletes, amateur astronomers. At work, they are managers, observers, graduate students, grant proposers, instrument builders and data analysts.

Throughout this project, all the bloggers will be asked to explain one particular aspect of their work to the public. In a true exercise of science communication, these scientists will use easy-to-understand language to translate the nuts and bolts of their scientific research into a popular science article. This will be their challenge.

Task Group:

Mariana Barrosa (Portugal, ESO ePOD)
Nuno Marques (Portugal, Web Developer)
Lee Pullen (UK, Freelance Science Communicator)
André Roquette (Portugal, ESO ePOD)

Jack Oughton (UK, Freelance Science Communicator)
Alice Enevoldsen (USA, Pacific Science Center)
Alberto Krone Martins (Brazil, Uni. S. Paulo / Uni. Bordeaux)
Kevin Govender (South Africa, S. A. A. O.)
Avivah Yamani (Indonesia, Rigel Kentaurus)
Henri Boffin (Belgium, ESO ePOD)

The 25 greatest discoveries in astronomy and astrophysics of the 20th century

Recently I pondered the question of what were the main achievements in astronomy and astrophysics in the 20th century. In fact in 2007 I gave a seminar in our department on just this topic. My talk generated quite a bit of discussion, but that’s because it was deliberately controversial!

Let me set the scene by describing the state of astronomical knowledge in 1900. The view was that we live in a large stellar system with the Sun near the centre. There was no knowledge of the interstellar medium, of external galaxies, or of how or why stars shine (nuclear astrophysics was some decades in the future). Planck had introduced the black-body spectrum in 1900, but the concept of the photon was still five years away (Einstein). There was no quantitative knowledge of element abundances or the chemical composition of stars, although it was known that stars contain many of the same elements that we find on Earth (H, He, Na, Ca, Mg, Fe etc). The electron was known as the particle of beta rays, but its role in ionization in stellar atmospheres was not yet understood. Astronomy was dominated by astrometry, celestial mechanics, and qualitative spectroscopy. Observations were visual or photographic. The classification of stellar spectra and measuring radial velocities were cutting edge research at the forefront of knowledge.

One hundred years later, our outlook on the universe was totally transformed. Astronomy in 2000 was clearly a branch of physics with the universe as a laboratory. We understand the relationship of stars to galaxies, galaxies to galactic clusters and clusters to the universe as a whole. Observational astronomy has been extended to the entire electromagnetic spectrum, covering a range in energy of 16 orders of magnitude from 100 MeV γ-rays to 10-8 eV long wave radio waves. We understand the basic facts of the evolution of the universe and can measure the ages of many objects in the universe. The big bang occurred as the instant of creation 13.7 × 109 years ago. We have an approximate idea of distances of objects at all distance scales from the nearest stars (~1 pc) to the most distant galaxies (~3 × 109 pc). In addition to stars, we observe the interstellar medium, galaxies, galactic clusters, active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes, cosmic rays, and we can detect extrasolar planets.

Still, we don’t fully understand gravity, have not detected gravitational waves, we don’t understand dark matter or dark energy, nor do we understand the universe within the first 10-42 s after the big bang, the interval known as the Planck time. We are still looking for Earth-like planets and for life on other planets, and do not know if such life exists. So there is still apparently much to do.

But how did we get from 1900 to 2000?

The answer is through a series of key discoveries of monumental significance, each of which blazed a new and often unexpected trail in astronomy and astrophysics.

In some cases the new discoveries were driven by new technology, especially in the detection of electromagnetic radiation (e.g. CCDs or IR arrays), or using telescopes in space, the application of digital data and computers, the use of optical fibres etc.

However, what is surprising is that most of the key discoveries came before the advent of the computer, CCD or space astronomy era from about 1975.

Here is my (possibly controversial) list of the 25 greatest discoveries of the 20th century. I have excluded the exploration of the solar system by spacecraft, and have given priority to discoveries of fundamentally new types of object or of new phenomena, which had a fundamental change in our view of the make-up or properties of the universe and the way it has evolved.

My list gives the 25 greatest discoveries in reverse order of importance, using my rather ill-defined criteria. Many discoveries come from multiple authors and multiple papers, but I list the main authors alongside each one.

25. Discovery of X-ray binaries (Rappaport, Giacconi et al. (1962))

24. Dynamics of galaxies and evidence for dark matter (Zwicky (1933), Rubin (1980), Huchra (1987))

23. Stellar temperature determinations from energy distributions (Wilsing and Scheiner (1909))

22. The concept of stellar populations (Baade (1944)).

21. The discovery of the H ion as the main source of opacity in the solar atmosphere (Wildt (1939)). This led to the ability to measure element abundances in the Sun and other later type stars.

20. The solar neutrino problem and its resolution in terms of neutrino oscillations (Davis (1976), Bahcall (1976, 1990))

19. Discovery of spiral structure in our Galaxy (Morgan, Osterbrock and Sharpless (1951))

18. Evidence for black holes: stellar mass and supermassive ones (K. Schwarzschild (1916), R. Kerr (1963); Bolton, Webster, Murdin (1972); Sargent, Young (1978))

17. Discovery of gamma-ray bursters (Klebesadel, Strong, Olson (1973))

16. Discovery of IS dust and extinction in the Milky Way (Trümpler (1930)).

15. Discovery of white dwarfs and understanding the theory of WDs (Russell, Fleming, Pickering (1910), Adams (1914), Chandrasekhar (1931))

14. Discovery of cosmic rays (Hess (1912))

13. Discovery of pulsars (Hewish, Bell (1967))

12. Understanding of element nucleosynthesis (B2FH (1957))

11. The discovery of radio waves of comic origin (Jansky, 1933; Reber, 1940). And the subsequent discovery of double-lobed radio galaxies (Jennison, Das Gupta (1953)).

10. Interpretation of stellar spectral lines and application of ionization to stellar atmospheres (Saha (1921), Payne (1925)). First quantitative stellar abundances.

9. Discovery of the cosmic microwave background radiation (Penzias and Wilson (1965))

8. Understanding of nuclear source of energy in the Sun and stars (Eddington (1920), Bethe (1938))

7. Discovery of quasars (Schmidt (1963), Sandage (1962))

6. Discovery of extrasolar planets (Mayor, Marcy et al. (1995)). RV method, transits.

5. The HR diagram (Hertzsprung (1911), Russell (1914)). This led much later to ideas of stellar evolution especially in 1960s by Schoenberg, Chandrasekhar, Hoyle, Schwarzschild, Henyey, Kippenhahn, Iben et al. in 1950s and 60s)

4. Prediction and discovery of 21-cm radiation; 21-cm map of Galaxy. (van der Hulst (1945), Ewen & Purcell (1951), Oort, F. Kerr & Westerhout (1958))

3. Location of the galactic centre (Shapley (1918), but based on Cepheid and cluster variable period-luminosity law of Leavitt (1912))

2. The extragalactic nature of spiral nebulae (Hubble (1925), Curtis (1920))

1. Hubble’s law and expansion of the universe (Hubble (1929), Slipher (1924), Humason (1935))

So much for my list. There are 42 papers listed in connection with 25 key discoveries.

If we look at the years of publication of these papers, there are two clear peaks

(a) 1911–1920 and (b) 1962–1978. What is more, since 1981 only four of the top 42 papers were published (9.5%). That is perhaps surprising, as there has been a ten-fold increase in the rate of publishing of refereed papers in astronomy and astrophysics in the last decade of the century relative to the first decade. In fact, since 1981 252,519 refereed 20th C papers were published (56.6%), whereas in the entire century there were 446,443 refereed papers (results thanks to ADS). Shouldn’t we therefore expect over half of the seminal discoveries of the 20th century to have been made since 1981? Not less than 10 per cent?

What do you think about my list and why so few remarkable discoveries of the 20th century have come since the space age and the explosion of the personal computer. Please comment on this blog!

I will give my explanation in a later blog this year.

Probably many astronomers will have other favourite discoveries in their top 25. When I gave my seminar in 2007, I actually prepared a list of 50 top discoveries, just to cover all bases and challenges to my top 25!

(written 9 Feb 2009)

Share/Save/Bookmark

8
  1. Peter Jackson

    They used to say physics wouldn’t change till the old physicists died. But the academic system now breeds clones of the old physicists, unable to think creatively as such thinking is quashed, so despite advances in technology the pace of discovery has been grinding to a halt.
    GR and QM are as far apart as they ever were as no possible concepts for solutions can get past the peer review system.
    Is this the end of our evolution?

  2. En Route

    Maybe the evidence for dark energy should make the top 25 (Riess et al. 1998, Perlmutter et al. 1999).

  3. Br Guy Consolmagno SJ

    What a wonderful post!

    I would suggest that the apparent dearth of papers since 1980 reflects the fact that we can’t always recognize what is important until a lot of time has passed. There are important discoveries in the past 30 years, but we haven’t had time to appreciate them yet.

    Or, it’s because all the good guys are now in Planetary Sciences (like me!) :)

  4. john

    Hello Brother Guy

    Thanks for your perspicacious comments! Actually I gave a couple of seminars on this topic this month, one in Prague and one in Granada, Spain (yesterday). I delayed posting my blog till after these. The seminars provoked much discussion (as intended) but one point was exactly the one you also make - it takes time to assess what is really important. I agree that my assessments are not rigorously scientific either - they are based on hunches.

    My list explicitly excluded solar system planetary science, so yes, the good ‘guys’ like you were not in the race. Sorry about that.

    It is interesting to compare my list with how Nobel prizes in astrophysics have been distributed. Of course the Nobel committee didn’t like astronomers until about 1975, so it only gives us some idea of what papers have been important since then, but it is clear that the Nobel committee makes mistakes too! More on this in a later blog. I will also extend my list to the top 50 or more discoveries and offer my main explanation of why there is such a dearth of key papers in the last two decades of the century, even though over half of the 20th C papers were published then.

  5. Ajay Patwardhan

    I recently gave a seminar on Discoveries in Astronomy — some ancient, some modern in Ahmedabad, India in a conference on Indian Astronomy. So I respond to your blog on this subject.

    The discoveries in Astronomy could be classified as making new instruments and observing and finding a new type of object, finding a new phenomenon in familiar objects, characterising and measuring uniquely, generically, precisely and for first time some property, finding new relations between variables or patterns, creating a new question or interpretation, a key model or general theory of a object, process or effect—- and possibly some more. You could classify the top 25 or 100 discoveries thus.

    Why are fewer discoveries happening or being recognised in the past 30 years ?? This question you pose to your readers.

    In each category above we can put in possible candidates and then give them the ranking by significance. There is more quantity of items, but not the level of quality of original discovery now. Considering that Greeks in 250 BC had catalogued 850 stars, and the Harvard catalog of 1910 consisted of spectra of a quarter million stars, the databases of today have reached 100 million stars and possibly a million galaxies.

    But is this just a ‘more of the same’ scenario !! There are new questions that can be answered by statistical analysis, and by computer simulation and image analysis. Large scale structure of the universe being one of them. Dark matter and dark energy, black holes, gravity waves are all ‘ emerging discoveries’; yet to be confirmed and recognised. So the list of discoveries will grow, as you say in ’spurts and gaps mode’.

    The array of instruments that are being built in this century will extend the reach and power of observational astronomy, and the distributed computing data analysis methods will give tools to ask new questions and find new answers. Astroparticle physics is on the threshold of discoveries. The main question of whether intelligent civilisations are isolated from one another in the universe or they become a galactic and extragalactic — communicating and travelling — civilisation; if answered as the latter case, it will likely shake the foundation of all science and humanity as we know now.

  6. harold nations

    Very interesting list but perhaps not so controversial after all?! I’m sure we all have our quibbles though (my main one is the placement of #4). I’d also suggest an omission: the remarkable success of the Lamda-Cold Dark Matter Concordance model on converging to a time since the Big Bang of 13.7E9 years with TINY error bars……

  7. Ingvar Åstrand

    Hej,
    I have many intresting new and understandable discoveries on my website http://www.theuniphysics.se

    Have a look and give a comment if you will se my explanations.
    I have much more to show you if you are interested.

    Ingvar

  8. Colin Navin

    Hi

    I am studying a MSc in astronomy at the moment so the list was really interesting in giving me some perspective on the really big things. I have tracked down some of the papers for my own interest - would it be possible to give citations to the actual papers instead of just the authors and year?

    If I could be presumptuous and make a suggestion for an addition to the list? Confirmation of Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity with the decay of the orbital period of the double neutron star binary PSR 1913+16 (Hulse, R.A. & Taylor, J.H. 1975, ApJ, 195, L51 and Taylor, J.H. & Weisberg, J.M. 1982, ApJ, 253, 908).

    cheers

    Colin